4.6 Article

Development of an Instrument to Assess the Health Related Quality of Life of Kidney Stone Formers

Journal

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 189, Issue 3, Pages 921-930

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.247

Keywords

quality of life; kidney calculi; urolithiasis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Urolithiasis is associated with pain and other decreases in health related quality of life, yet there is no urolithiasis specific instrument to measure quality of life. Quality of life is an important end point in the management of urolithiasis. Therefore, we developed the Wisconsin StoneQOL, a disease specific instrument to assess the quality of life of patients with urolithiasis. Materials and Methods: Patients and urology providers identified important concepts related to quality of life of stone formers in groups and in individual cognitive interviews. Patients were recurrent stone formers including those with and those without current stones. A preliminary instrument was created, followed by patient feedback and item reduction. A 28-question instrument was ultimately developed which was tested for reliability as well as internal face, construct and discriminant validity in 248 stone formers. Results: The internal consistency (for questions within domains) was high (mean Cronbach's alpha = 0.81). Correlation between domains was confirmed (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). Discriminant validity was shown as stone formers with current stones scored lower than those who were stone-free. Among patients with active stones, those with symptoms scored lower on most questions and for the total score (p <0.0001) than those who were asymptomatic. Conclusions: The Wisconsin StoneQOL holds promise as a disease specific instrument that captures the unique symptoms and challenges associated with urolithiasis. As such, the Wisconsin StoneQOL is capable of assessing the health related quality of life of stone formers at various points along the disease continuum. Future assessment will establish minimal clinically important differences for use in individual patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available