4.8 Article

Visible photoelectrochemical water splitting into H2 and O2 in a dye-sensitized photoelectrosynthesis cell

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1506111112

Keywords

dye-sensitized photoelectrosynthesis cell; water oxidation; core/shell

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001011]
  2. University of North Carolina Energy Frontier Research Center: Center for Solar Fuels, an Energy Frontier Research Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A hybrid strategy for solar water splitting is exploited here based on a dye-sensitized photoelectrosynthesis cell (DSPEC) with a mesoporous SnO2/TiO2 core/shell nanostructured electrode derivatized with a surface-bound Ru(II) polypyridyl-based chromophore-catalyst assembly. The assembly, [(4,4'-(PO3H2)(2)bpy)(2)Ru(4-Mebpy-4'-bimpy) Ru (tpy)(OH2)](4+) ([Rua II-Rub II-OH2](4+), combines both a light absorber and a water oxidation catalyst in a single molecule. It was attached to the TiO2 shell by phosphonate-surface oxide binding. The oxide-bound assembly was further stabilized on the surface by atomic layer deposition (ALD) of either Al2O3 or TiO2 overlayers. Illumination of the resulting fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) jSnO(2)/TiO(2)j-[Rua II-Rub II-OH2](4+) (Al2O3 or TiO2) photoanodes in photoelectrochemical cells with a Pt cathode and a small applied bias resulted in visible-light water splitting as shown by direct measurements of both evolved H-2 and O-2. The performance of the resulting DSPECs varies with shell thickness and the nature and extent of the oxide overlayer. Use of the SnO2/TiO2 core/shell compared with nanoITO/TiO2 with the same assembly results in photocurrent enhancements of similar to 5. Systematic variations in shell thickness and ALD overlayer lead to photocurrent densities as high as 1.97 mA/cm(2) with 445-nm, similar to 90-mW/cm(2) illumination in a phosphate buffer at pH 7.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available