4.8 Article

Prophylactic and postexposure efficacy of a potent human monoclonal antibody against MERS coronavirus

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510199112

Keywords

MERS-CoV; neutralizing antibody; serotherapy; emerging viruses

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [AI085524, AI110700]
  2. NIH [RO1 AI091322, PO1 AI060699]
  3. Public Health England
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [147662, 138518]
  5. Swiss Vaccine Research Institute
  6. Helmut Horten Foundation
  7. NIAID [HHSN272201000013I]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is a highly lethal pulmonary infection caused by a previously unidentified coronavirus (CoV), likely transmitted to humans by infected camels. There is no licensed vaccine or antiviral for MERS, therefore newprophylactic and therapeutic strategies to combat human infections are needed. In this study, we describe, for the first time, to our knowledge, the isolation of a potent MERS-CoV-neutralizing antibody from memory B cells of an infected individual. The antibody, named LCA60, binds to a novel site on the spike protein and potently neutralizes infection of multiple MERS-CoV isolates by interfering with the binding to the cellular receptor CD26. Importantly, using mice transduced with adenovirus expressing human CD26 and infected with MERS-CoV, we show that LCA60 can effectively protect in both prophylactic and postexposure settings. This antibody can be used for prophylaxis, for postexposure prophylaxis of individuals at risk, or for the treatment of human cases of MERS-CoV infection. The fact that it took only 4 mo from the initial screening of B cells derived from a convalescent patient for the development of a stable chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line producing neutralizing antibodies at more than 5 g/L provides an example of a rapid pathway toward the generation of effective antiviral therapies against emerging viruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available