4.8 Article

Benefits of mercury controls for the United States

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514395113

Keywords

mercury; policy; impacts assessment; Minamata Convention; economic benefits

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1053648, 131755]
  2. J. H. and E. V. Wade Fund (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. MIT Sociotechnical Systems Research Center Stokes Fund
  5. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1053648] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. ICER
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [1313755] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mercury pollution poses risks for both human and ecosystem health. As a consequence, controlling mercury pollution has become a policy goal on both global and national scales. We developed an assessment method linking global-scale atmospheric chemical transport modeling to regional-scale economic modeling to consistently evaluate the potential benefits to the United States of global (UN Minamata Convention on Mercury) and domestic [Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS)] policies, framed as economic gains from avoiding mercury-related adverse health endpoints. This method attempts to trace the policies-to-impacts path while taking into account uncertainties and knowledge gaps with policy-appropriate bounding assumptions. We project that cumulative lifetime benefits from the Minamata Convention for individuals affected by 2050 are $339 billion (2005 USD), with a range from $1.4 billion to $575 billion in our sensitivity scenarios. Cumulative economy-wide benefits to the United States, realized by 2050, are $104 billion, with a range from $6 million to $171 billion. Projected Minamata benefits are more than twice those projected from the domestic policy. This relative benefit is robust to several uncertainties and variabilities, with the ratio of benefits (Minamata/MATS) ranging from approximate to 1.4 to 3. However, we find that for those consuming locally caught freshwater fish from the United States, rather than marine and estuarine fish from the global market, benefits are larger from US than global action, suggesting domestic policies are important for protecting these populations. Per megagram of prevented emissions, our domestic policy scenario results in US benefits about an order of magnitude higher than from our global scenario, further highlighting the importance of domestic action.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available