4.8 Article

Eliminating hepatitis B by antagonizing cellular inhibitors of apoptosis

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1502400112

Keywords

hepatitis B virus; cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins; TNF; birinapant; Smac mimetic

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship Award [FT1301000166]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council Australia Career Development Award [637350, 541902, 1006592, 1045549, 1065626]
  3. Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support
  4. Independent Research Institutes Infrastructure Support Scheme of the Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have shown that cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) impair clearance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection by preventing TNF-mediated killing/death of infected cells. A key question, with profound therapeutic implications, is whether this finding can be translated to the development of drugs that promote elimination of infected cells. Drug inhibitors of cIAPs were developed as cancer therapeutics to promote TNF-mediated tumor killing. These drugs are also known as Smac mimetics, because they mimic the action of the endogenous protein Smac/Diablo that antagonizes cIAP function. Here, we show using an immunocompetent mouse model of chronic HBV infection that birinapant and other Smac mimetics are able to rapidly reduce serum HBV DNA and serum HBV surface antigen, and they promote the elimination of hepatocytes containing HBV core antigen. The efficacy of Smac mimetics in treating HBV infection is dependent on their chemistry, host CD4(+) T cells, and TNF. Birinapant enhances the ability of entecavir, an antiviral nucleoside analog, to reduce viral DNA production in HBV-infected animals. These results indicate that birinapant and other Smac mimetics may have efficacy in treating HBV infection and perhaps, other intracellular infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available