4.6 Article

The heterochromatin protein 1 family is regulated in prostate development and cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 179, Issue 6, Pages 2435-2439

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.091

Keywords

prostate; prostatic neoplasms; heterochromatin-specific nonhistone chromosomal protein HP-1; fetal development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The HP1 family of evolutionarily conserved proteins regulates heterochromatin packaging, in addition to a less defined role in the regulation of euchromatic genes. To examine the possible role of HP1 proteins in fetal prostate development and prostate cancer the protein expression of HP1 alpha, beta and gamma was evaluated in human archival tissue. Materials and Methods: Tissue sections from human prostate cancer and fetal prostate were examined using antibodies against HP1 isoforms to evaluate HP1 modulation in cancer and development. Western blot analysis of HP1 proteins was also performed in extracts of cultured prostate cancer cells. Results: HP1 alpha, beta and gamma are differentially regulated in various cellular compartments in prostate development. HP1 alpha is not expressed at 14 or 24 weeks of prostate development but it is expressed in adult prostate tissue. HP1 beta is highly expressed at 14 and 24 weeks, and it appears predominantly in epithelial cells compared to HP1 gamma, which is expressed at equal levels in epithelial and stromal cells. All 3 HP1 isoforms show altered expression in prostate cancer compared to that in normal adult prostate tissue. Conclusions: HP1 proteins are tightly regulated during prostate development. In the adult prostate HP1 alpha, beta and gamma antibodies detect high levels of HP1 antigen in a contiguous layer of epithelial cells. However, the detection of HP1 in prostate cancer ranges from undetectable to inconsistent staining of noncontiguous epithelial cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available