4.8 Article

Spatial gradient in value representation along the medial prefrontal cortex reflects individual differences in prosociality

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423895112

Keywords

medial prefrontal cortex; striatum; anterior insula; reinforcement learning; computational model

Funding

  1. Korea University
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea grants from the Korean Government [NRF-2012-S1A3-A2033375, 2006-2005110]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P1_128574, PP00P1_150739, CRSII3_141965]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2006-2005110] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the importance of valuing another person's welfare for prosocial behavior, currently we have only a limited understanding of how these values are represented in the brain and, more importantly, how they give rise to individual variability in prosociality. In the present study, participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a prosocial learning task in which they could choose to benefit themselves and/or another person. Choice behavior indicated that participants valued the welfare of another person, although less so than they valued their own welfare. Neural data revealed a spatial gradient in activity within the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), such that ventral parts predominantly represented self-regarding values and dorsal parts predominantly represented other-regarding values. Importantly, compared with selfish individuals, prosocial individuals showed a more gradual transition from self-regarding to other-regarding value signals in the MPFC and stronger MPFC-striatum coupling when they made choices for another person rather than for themselves. The present study provides evidence of neural markers reflecting individual differences in human prosociality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available