4.8 Article

Discriminating direct and indirect connectivities in biological networks

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1507168112

Keywords

reverse engineering; synthetic biology; direct and indirect connectivities; human cells; nonparametric resampling

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [GM098984, GM096271, CA17001801]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBNET-1105524]
  3. University of Texas at Dallas
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-14-1-0060]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1105524, 1351354] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1361355] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reverse engineering of biological pathways involves an iterative process between experiments, data processing, and theoretical analysis. Despite concurrent advances in quality and quantity of data as well as computing resources and algorithms, difficulties in deciphering direct and indirect network connections are prevalent. Here, we adopt the notions of abstraction, emulation, benchmarking, and validation in the context of discovering features specific to this family of connectivities. After subjecting benchmark synthetic circuits to perturbations, we inferred the network connections using a combination of non-parametric single-cell data resampling and modular response analysis. Intriguingly, we discovered that recovered weights of specific network edges undergo divergent shifts under differential perturbations, and that the particular behavior is markedly different between topologies. Our results point to a conceptual advance for reverse engineering beyond weight inference. Investigating topological changes under differential perturbations may address the longstanding problem of discriminating direct and indirect connectivities in biological networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available