4.5 Article

Strain Elastography for Prediction of Breast Cancer Tumor Grades

Journal

JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 129-134

Publisher

AMER INST ULTRASOUND MEDICINE
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.1.129

Keywords

breast; breast cancer; breast ultrasound; elastography; strain; tumor grade

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives-The purpose of this study was to determine whether the elasticity imaging/B-mode ratio on strain elastography can predict breast cancer tumor grades. Methods-A retrospective review of patients with breast lesions who underwent strain elastography and had a diagnosis of breast cancer by image-guided or surgical biopsy was performed. The axis of the maximum elastographic dimension was compared to the B-mode dimension to form an elasticity imaging/B-mode ratio. Lesions were categorized according to their pathologic type, including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), mucinous or colloid cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), grade I invasive ductal carcinoma (MC), grade II IDC, grade III DC, invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), and lymphoma. The mean elasticity imaging/B-mode ratio of each tumor type was calculated. The elasticity imaging/B-mode ratio of the tumor was compared to the tumor type by Kruskal-Wallis and Tukey-Kramer tests (lymphoma and ADH excluded because of small numbers). Results-Tumor grades included lymphoma (n = 3),.ADH (n = 2), mucinous cancer (n = 11), DCIS (n = 19), DC (grades I III; n = 200), and ILC (n = 31). The mean elasticity imaging/B-mode ratio varied with increasing tumor grade. Tumor grades could not have been selected at random from one population (P < .0001, chi(2) test). Invasive lobular carcinoma and grade III DC were statistically different from mucinous or colloid cancer, DCIS, and grade land II IDC. Conclusions-The elasticity imaging/B-mode ratio on strain elastography is related to the tumor grade.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available