4.0 Article

Below-ground secondary succession in tropical forests of Borneo

Journal

JOURNAL OF TROPICAL ECOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue -, Pages 413-420

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0266467411000149

Keywords

fine-root biomass; Indonesia; nitrogen; root nutrients; shifting cultivation; soil carbon; soils; tropical lowland evergreen rain forest

Categories

Funding

  1. Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland
  2. Trinity College Dublin Association and Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the destruction and severe disturbance of primary tropical forest continues, it is important to understand how these forests may recover from perturbations. Considerable work has been done on above-ground recovery but below-ground processes are less well understood. To determine changes in root mass during tropical secondary succession in lowland forests of Central Borneo, samples were taken from stands of increasing ages since abandonment of agriculture (1, 3, 14 and 31 y) with a primary forest control (six plots from 1-y-old stands and three from all other ages). Root mass and elemental concentrations were determined and soils were chemically analysed. There was no increase in root mass with stand age for fine-root (< 2 mm diameter) or small-root (< 5 mm diameter) mass but there was a trend for coarse-root mass (5-10 mm diameter) to increase with stand age. Negative correlations were shown between root mass and soil nutrient status. Fine-root C concentrations increased with stand age but there was no clear effect of stand age on fine-root N or P. Fine-root mass did not increase significantly with stand age suggesting a rapid recovery; instead, soil nutrient status appeared to be the most important factor controlling root mass. Of the soil nutrients measured in this study, N had a stronger control over root mass than P suggesting that this element may be limiting during secondary succession in tropical lowland forests of Borneo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available