4.0 Article

Seasonal variation in soil and plant water potentials in a Bolivian tropical moist and dry forest

Journal

JOURNAL OF TROPICAL ECOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages 497-508

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0266467410000271

Keywords

Acosmium cardenasii; Ampelocera ruizii; Bolivia; drought; leaf water potential; soil depth; soil water availability; Solanum riparium; Sweetia fruticosa; Trema micrantha

Categories

Funding

  1. Wageningen C.T. de Wit graduate school for Production Ecology and Resource Conservation (PERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We determined seasonal variation in soil matric potentials (psi(soil)) along a topographical gradient and with soil depth in a Bolivian tropical dry (1160 mm y(-1) rain) and moist forest (1580 mm y-1). In each forest we analysed the effect of drought on predawn leaf water potentials (psi(pd)) and drought response (midday leaf water potential at a standardized psi(pd) of -0.98 MPa;psi(md)) of saplings of three tree species, varying in shade-tolerance and leaf phenology. psi(soil) changed during the dry season and most extreme in the dry forest. Crests were drier than slopes and valleys. Dry-forest top soil was drier than deep soil in the dry season, the inverse was found in the wet season. In the moist forest the drought-deciduous species, Sweetia fruticosa, occupied dry sites. In the dry forest the short-lived pioneer, Solanum riparium, occupied wet sites and the shade-tolerant species, Acosmium cardenasii drier sites. Moist-forest species had similar drought response. The dry-forest pioneer showed a larger drought response than the other two species. Heterogeneity in soil water availability and interspecific differences in moisture requirements and drought response suggest great potential for niche differentiation. Species may coexist at different topographical locations, by extracting water from different soil layers and/or by doing so at different moments in time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available