4.0 Article

Growth of Bauhinia thonningii trees and saplings over a decade in a savanna in Zambia:: interactions of climate, fire and source of regeneration

Journal

JOURNAL OF TROPICAL ECOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue -, Pages 407-415

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0266467408005099

Keywords

autocorrelated growth; climate factors; coppice; fire; radial growth; savanna; seedlings; shoot die-back; Zambia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigated how climate and plant size affect the growth of Bauhinia thonningii and how fire and source of regeneration (grown from coppice versus seedlings) might modify the results. The study was conducted over a period of 10 y, from 1997 to 2007, at a savanna site in central Zambia. Trees were marked and monitored throughout the entire period; they showed a phase of declining growth (1998-2003) and a phase of low growth (2004-2007). During the phase of declining growth autocorrelation was high but either weakened or disappeared during the phase of low growth. After adjusting data for autocorrelation, climate factors and tree size accounted for between 14% and 35% of the variation in annual tree radial growth. However, the growth responses of trees to climate factors and tree size varied with the source of regeneration (i.e. coppice or seedling) and fire treatment. Trees of seedling origin were only affected by climate factors and tree size when exposed to annual burning whereas all trees of coppice origin were significantly affected by climate factors and tree size, regardless of the fire treatment. However, basal radial growth of saplings that were monitored for 4 y (2003-2007) was significantly influenced by maximum temperature and rainfall that accounted for 33-47% of the variance in annual radial growth under fire protection. Saplings recovered from shoot die-back during the cool dry season by resprouting in the hot dry season and this annual die-back slowed the height growth of B. thonningii saplings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available