4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Fibrinolysis greater than 3% is the critical value for initiation of antifibrinolytic therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY
Volume 75, Issue 6, Pages 961-967

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aa9c9f

Keywords

Thromboelastography; fibrinolysis; mortality; trauma; massive transfusion

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [P50 GM049222, T32 GM008315] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The acute coagulopathy of trauma is present in up to one third of patients by the time of admission, and the recent CRASH-2 and MATTERs trials have focused worldwide attention on hyperfibrinolysis as a component of acute coagulopathy of trauma. Thromboelastography (TEG) is a powerful tool for analyzing fibrinolyis, but a clinically relevant threshold for defining hyperfibrinolysis has yet to be determined. Recent data suggest that the accepted normal upper bound of 7.5% for 30-minute fibrinolysis (LY30) by TEG is inappropriate in severe trauma, as the risk of death rises at much lower levels of clot lysis. We wished to determine the validity of this hypothesis and establish a threshold value to treat fibrinolysis, based on prediction of massive transfusion requirement and risk of mortality. METHODS: Patients with uncontrolled hemorrhage, meeting the massive transfusion protocol (MTP) criteria at admission (n = 73), represent the most severely injured trauma population at our center (median Injury Severity Score [ISS], 30; interquartile range, 20-38). Citrated kaolin TEG was performed at admission blood samples from this population, stratified by LY30, and evaluated for transfusion requirement and 28-day mortality. The same analysis was conducted on available field blood samples from all non-MTP trauma patients (n = 216) in the same period. These represent the general trauma population. RESULTS: Within the MTP-activating population, the cohort of patients with LY30 of 3% or greater was shown to be at much higher risk for requiring a massive transfusion (90.9% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.0008) and dying of hemorrhage (45.5% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.0014) than those with LY30 less than 3%. Similar trends were seen in the general trauma population. CONCLUSION: LY30 of 3% or greater defines clinically relevant hyperfibrinolysis and strongly predicts the requirement for massive transfusion and an increased risk of mortality in trauma patients presenting with uncontrolled hemorrhage. This threshold value for LY30 represents a critical indication for the treatment of fibrinolysis. (Copyright (C) 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available