4.7 Article

EGFR-specific T cell frequencies correlate with EGFR expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-168

Keywords

EGFR; head and neck carcinoma; tetramer; EGFR-specific T cells

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA097190] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE019727] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), expression levels of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) correlate with poor prognosis and decreased survival rates. As the mechanisms responsible for cellular immune response to EGFR in vivo remain unclear, the frequency and function of EGFR-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTL) was determined in HNSCC patients. Methods: The frequency of CTL specific for the HLA-A2.1-restricted EGFR-derived YLN peptide (YLNTVQPTCV) and KLF peptide (KLFGTSGQKT) was determined in 16 HLA-A2.1(+) HNSCC patients and 16 healthy HLA-A2.1(+) individuals (NC) by multicolor flow cytometry. Patients' results were correlated to EGFR expression obtained by immunohistochemistry in corresponding tumor sections. Proliferation and anti-tumor activity of peptide-specific CTL was demonstrated by in vitro stimulation with dendritic cells pulsed with the peptides. Results: Frequency of EGFR-specific CTL correlated significantly with EGFR expression in tumor sections (p = 0.02, r(2) = 0.6). Patients with elevated EGFR scores (> 7) had a significantly higher frequency of EGFR-specific CTL than NC and patients with low EGFR scores (< 7). EGFR-specific CTL from cancer patients were expanded ex vivo and produced IFN-gamma upon recognition of EGFR(+) target cells. Conclusion: EGFR expressed on HNSCC cells induces a specific immune response in vivo. Strategies for expansion of EGFR-specific CTL may be important for future immunotherapy of HNSCC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available