4.3 Article

Gender difference in blood cadmium concentration in the general population: Can it be explained by iron deficiency?

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 322-327

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2014.02.003

Keywords

Cadmium; Ferritin; Gender; Menopause

Funding

  1. grant of the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI13C0713]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Gender differences in blood cadmium concentrations and the effect of iron deficiency on blood cadmium levels were analyzed in a representative sample of Koreans assessed in the Korean National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2008-2011. Methods: A rolling sampling design was used to perform a complex, stratified, multistage probability cluster survey of a representative sample of the non-institutionalized civilian population in South Korea. Serum ferritin was categorized as low (<15.0 mu g/L), low normal (15.0-<30.0 mu g/L for females and 15.0-<50.0 mu g/L for males), and normal (>= 30.0 mu g/L for females and >= 50.0 mu g/L for males), and its association with blood cadmium levels was assessed after adjustment for various demographic and lifestyle factors. Results: The geometric mean (GM) of the blood cadmium level was significantly higher in females than in males, and significantly higher in older individuals for both genders. After controlling for covariates, multiple regression analysis with interaction terms showed that blood cadmium was correlated with serum ferritin levels only in pre-menopausal females. Discussion: Iron deficiency is associated with blood cadmium levels in a representative sample of premenopausal females, as evaluated in KNHANES. Gender differences in blood cadmium concentration may not be due solely to an iron deficiency-associated increase in blood cadmium. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available