4.2 Article

Effects of Gut Microflora on Pharmacokinetics of Hesperidin: A Study on Non-Antibiotic and Pseudo-Germ-Free Rats

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2010.511549

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Food & Drug Administration [09172KFDA996]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hesperidin is a biologically active flavanone glycoside occurring abundantly in citrus fruits. In the present study, effects of intestinal microflora on pharmacokinetics of hesperidin were investigated using a pseudo-germ-free rat model treated with antibiotics. After administration of hesperidin to rats, hesperetin, hesperetin glucuronides, and metabolites postulated to be eriodictyol, hemoeriodictyol, and their glucuronides were detected in urine while hesperetin glucuronide was predominantly found in plasma. The plasma concentration-time profile of hesperetin was compared between non-antibiotic-exposed and pseudo-germ-free rats administered this compound. The maximal concentration (Cmax) values of hesperetin in non-antibiotic-exposed and pseudo-germ-free rats were 0.58 and 0.20 g/ml, respectively, and area under the curve (AUC) values were 6.3 and 2.8 g-h/ml, respectively. Thus, systemic exposure as evidenced by AUC and Cmax was significantly higher in normal compared to pseudo-germ-free rats. Fecal -glucosidase activities of non-antibiotic-exposed and pseudo-germ-free rats were 0.21 and 0.11 nmol/min/mg, while fecal -rhamnosidase activities were 0.37 and 0.12 nmol/min/mg, respectively. The rate of hesperidin transformation to hesperetin was 6.9 and 2.9 nmol/min/g in fecal samples in non-antibiotic-exposed and pseudo-germ-free rats, respectively. Taken together, these results showed that pharmacokinetic differences between non-antibiotic-exposed and pseudo-germ-free rats may be attributed to differing hesperidin uptake, as well as alterations in metabolic activities of intestinal flora.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available