4.6 Article

Developmental hemostasis: age-specific differences in the levels of hemostatic proteins

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 1850-1854

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jth.12372

Keywords

blood coagulation factors; hemostasis; neonatal screening; pediatrics; reference ranges

Funding

  1. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IntroductionDevelopmental hemostasis recognizes the physiologic differences between the hemostatic system of neonates and children and that of adults. As compared with the knowledge of hemostatic system physiology in adults, our understanding in neonates and children remains inadequate. Routine clinical coagulation testing most commonly measures functional parameters of the hemostatic system. Very few studies have measured age-specific levels of hemostatic proteins. An understanding of the normal fluctuations in the levels of hemostatic proteins is vital in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of hemostatic problems during infancy and childhood. This study was designed as the first comprehensive study of the age-specific changes in the levels of important hemostatic proteins in healthy neonates, children, and adults. MethodsPlasma samples were obtained from 120 healthy individuals from the following age groups: neonates (day1 and day3), 28days to 1year, 1-5years, 6-10years, 11-16years, and adults. FactorII, FV, FVII, FVIII, FIX, FX, FXI, FXII, FXIII, plasminogen, proteinC and total and free proteinS were quantified with commercially available ELISA kits. ResultsThe levels of 10 proteins were significantly different between neonates and adults, and these differences persisted throughout childhood for most of these proteins. ConclusionThe results of this study confirm that the levels of the majority of coagulation proteins vary significantly with age. Future studies should investigate how hemostatic protein level relates to functional changes with age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available