4.4 Article

Lateral response of cable-guided hoisting system with time-varying length: Theoretical model and dynamics simulation verification

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0954406214566032

Keywords

Cable guide; lateral response; time-varying stiffness; ADAMS simulation; verification

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51475456]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012LWB35]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1292]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lateral response of the moving hoisting conveyance in cable-guided hoisting system is investigated in this paper. The equations of motion are derived by Hamilton's principle while the equivalent mass and stiffness of the guide cables are formulated. Galerkin method is employed to transform the governing equation into a set of ordinary differential equations. Subsequently, an ADAMS simulation model based on multi-degree of freedom is established to validate the theoretical model. Meanwhile, a high-efficiency simulation approach is proposed, in which the contact force is replaced with fixed joints and distance sensors. The numerical solution for equations set is obtained using Newmark- method and the convergence of the solution is discussed, then the presented theoretical model is compared with the previous models describing the rigid rail-guided hoisting system. The results indicate that the numerical simulations are in reasonably good agreement with the ADAMS simulations and this presented model includes the previous models. The influence of parameters on the lateral response is analyzed, which reveals the maximum lateral displacement is linearly proportional to the excitation amplitude. Also, the appropriate preload can be determined by the theoretical model, which is beneficial for vibration control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available