4.6 Article

T-cell responses in two unrelated hemophilia A inhibitor subjects include an epitope at the factor VIII R593C missense site

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 689-699

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04202.x

Keywords

factor VIII; hemophilia A; HLA; inhibitor; T-cell clones

Funding

  1. CSL Behring, Inc.
  2. Bayer Hemophilia Award
  3. NIH [HL R01 07109, 1RC2HL101851-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Development of neutralizing anti-factor (F) VIII antibodies ('inhibitors') is a serious clinical problem in hemophilia A. Increased inhibitor risk has been associated with certain FVIII missense substitutions, including R593C in the A2 domain. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to identify T-cell epitopes in FVIII and characterize T-cell responses in two unrelated hemophilia A subjects sharing F8-R593C and HLA-DRB1*1101 genotypes. We hypothesized that the hemophilic substitution site coincides with an important T-cell epitope. Patients/methods: The binding affinities of peptides for recombinant HLA-DR proteins were measured and compared with epitope prediction results. CD4+ T cells were stimulated using peptides and stained with fluorescent, peptide-loaded tetramers. Results: The inhibitor subjects, but not HLA-matched controls, had high-avidity HLA-DRB1*1101-restricted T-cell responses against FVIII(589-608), which contains the hemophilic missense site. Antigen-specific T cells secreted Th1 and Th2 cytokines and proliferated in response to FVIII and FVIII(592-603). FVIII(589-608) bound with physiologically relevant (micromolar) IC(50) values to recombinant DR0101, DR1101 and DR1501 proteins. Conclusions: Hemophilia A patients with R593C missense substitutions and these HLA haplotypes had an increased incidence of inhibitors in our cohorts, supporting a paradigm in which presentation of FVIII epitopes containing the wild-type R593 influences inhibitor risk in this hemophilia A sub-population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available