4.6 Article

Standardization of platelet-derived microparticle counting using calibrated beads and a Cytomics FC500 routine flow cytometer: a first step towards multicenter studies?

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 190-197

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03200.x

Keywords

beads; flow cytometry; megamix; microparticles; standardization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Platelet microparticles (PMPs) have proved useful to identify patients with vascular risk. However, PMP counting, which is currently done by flow cytometry (FCM), needs to be standardized. Objectives: The objectives were (i) to standardize FCM settings for PMP counts on a routine instrument (Cytomics FC500) using size-calibrated fluorescent beads; (ii) to determine intra-instrument and interinstrument reproducibility; and (iii) to establish PMP values in healthy subjects. Methods: Using a blend of size-calibrated fluorescent beads (0.5 and 0.9 mu m) in a fixed numerical ratio (Megamix), we gated PMPs in a restricted size window. To test intra-instrument and inter-instrument reproducibility, annexin V and CD41 coexpression were used to count PMPs in frozen aliquots of the same platelet-free plasma (PFP) over 4 months and in PFP from 10 healthy subjects on three independent flow cytometers. Results: This calibrated-bead strategy allowed full long-term control of the FCM-based microparticle protocol and reproducible PMP counts over time [coefficient of variation (CV) < 10%]. Optimal settings were easily transferred from one instrument to another, using Megamix as a stable template. Similar PMP counts (CV < 12%) were obtained using the three instruments. With such a standardized FCM protocol, PMP values were established in healthy subjects (n = 60) with significantly higher levels in women than in men [median (1st quartile to 3rd quartile): 1775 mu L-1 (1014-3039 mu L-1) vs. 656 mu L-1 (407-962 mu L-1)]. Conclusions: The present strategy provides a new option for PMP count standardization and thus opens the way for multicenter studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available