4.6 Article

Racial differences in endotoxin-induced tissue factor-triggered coagulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 634-640

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03307.x

Keywords

coagulation; Duffy antigen; endotoxin; MCP-1; tissue factor

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [T32 HL007820-10] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Racial differences in coagulation are poorly understood. While some studies suggest a 'prothrombotic' coagulation profile in blacks compared with whites, others report an increased bleeding risk for blacks in various clinical settings. Moreover, preclinical data suggest a link between the Duffy antigen (= DARC, Duffy antigen receptor of chemokines) and coagulation. Objectives: Based on our previous research in Duffy antigen negative Africans, we hypothesized that Africans have an attenuated procoagulant response compared with Caucasians in a model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced, tissue factor (TF)-triggered coagulation activation. Patients/methods: Healthy male volunteers (16 Duffy-negative Africans, 16 Duffy-positive Caucasians) received 2 ng kg(-1) LPS, and outcome parameters were measured using enzyme immunoassays and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR, Taqman). Results: LPS increased microparticle (MP)-associated TF procoagulant activity (PCA) less in Africans than Caucasians. Africans had reduced in vivo thrombin formation compared with Caucasians: they generated less thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes (10.4 pg mL(-1) vs. 23.0 pg mL(-1), P < 0.0001) and less prothrombin fragments (F1+2) (337 pmol mL(-1) vs. 819 pmol mL(-1), P < 0.0001). Consistently, Africans also had decreased fibrin formation (d-dimer: 0.3 pg mL(-1) vs. 0.5 pg mL(-1), P = 0.02). Conclusion: Duffy-negative subjects of African descent have a markedly reduced procoagulant response in a model of LPS-induced, TF-triggered coagulation activation compared with Duffy-positive healthy Caucasians.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available