4.6 Article

Identification of a novel, actin-rich structure, the actin nodule, in the early stages of platelet spreading

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 1944-1952

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03141.x

Keywords

actin cytoskeleton; Arp2/3; platelet spreading; Rho kinase; Src kinases

Funding

  1. British Heart Foundation
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. MRC
  4. American Heart Association
  5. BHF
  6. AHA [0665512Z]
  7. Medical Research Council [G117/569] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [G117/569] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: During platelet spreading, the actin cytoskeleton undergoes marked changes, forming filopodia, lamellipodia and stress fibres. In the present study, we report the identification of a novel actin-rich structure, termed an actin nodule, which appears prior to lamellipodia and stress fibre formation. Methods: Platelet spreading was monitored using human platelets and mouse GFP-actin platelets using real-time and end-point DIC, and fluorescent and electron microscopy (EM). Results: We identified a small, novel actin structure, the actin nodule, in the early stages of adhesion and spreading, which we hypothesize to be a precursor of lamellipodia and stress fibres. Nodule formation shows an inverse correlation to Rho kinase and myosin-II activity, is independent of PI3-kinase, but dependent on Src kinase activity. Actin nodules contain multiple proteins, including Arp2/3, Fyn, Rac, and beta 1- and beta 3- integrins, but not Src. EM analysis revealed that actin filaments extend in all directions from the nodules. Actin nodules are present on multiple matrices, including fibrinogen, laminin and VWF + botrocetin. Conclusion: This work identifies a novel platelet actin structure, which we propose is a precursor to both lamellipodia and stress fibres and acts to drive platelet spreading.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available