4.6 Article

Survival in Women with NSCLC The Role of Reproductive History and Hormone Use

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 355-361

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000077

Keywords

Non-small-cell lung cancer; Hormone use; Survival

Funding

  1. NIH [R01-CA87895, N01-PC35145, P30CA22453]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Although lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women, few studies have investigated the hormonal influence on survival after a lung cancer diagnosis and results have been inconsistent. We evaluated the role of reproductive and hormonal factors in predicting overall survival in women with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Population-based lung cancer cases diagnosed between November 1, 2001 and October 31, 2005 were identified through the Metropolitan Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry. Interview and follow-up data were collected for 485 women. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine hazard ratios (HRs) for death after an NSCLC diagnosis associated with reproductive and hormonal variables. Results: Use of hormone therapy (HT) was associated with improved survival (HR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.89), adjusting for stage, surgery, radiation, education level, pack-years of smoking, age at diagnosis, race, and a multiplicative interaction between stage and radiation. No other reproductive or hormonal factor was associated with survival after an NSCLC diagnosis. Increased duration of HT use before the lung cancer diagnosis (132 months or longer) was associated with improved survival (HR, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.78), and this finding remained significant in women taking either estrogen alone or progesterone plus estrogen, never smokers, and smokers. Conclusion: These findings suggest that HT use, in particular use of estrogen plus progesterone, and long-term HT use are associated with improved survival of NSCLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available