4.5 Article

Failure investigation of fused deposition modelling parts fabricated at different raster angles under tensile and flexural loading

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0954405415617447

Keywords

Fused deposition modelling; surface roughness; tensile strength; flexural strength; failure; scanning electron microscope

Funding

  1. All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), New Delhi, India, under RPS [20/AICTE/RIFD/RPS (POLICY - III) 92/2012-13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fused deposition modelling is an efficient rapid prototyping process used to rapidly fabricate three-dimensional solid objects with complicated geometries. Many process parameters affect the fused deposition modelling process and their settings influence the quality of the specimen. This article investigates the effect of raster angle on surface roughness (along and across the length direction) and mechanical properties (tensile and flexural strength) of fused deposition modelling parts built at 10 different raster angles (0 degrees-90 degrees at 10 degrees interval). All parts are built using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene P430 material. Surface roughness for circular and parabolic curved surfaces is also measured when specimens are built at different raster angles. Fracture surfaces are inspected with scanning electron microscope to study the modes of failure under different loading conditions. The samples where raster angle is 0 degrees and layers are deposited along the length of the specimen exhibited optimal mechanical strength and good surface finish (when measured along the length). Scanning electron microscope results reveal that for 0 degrees raster angle, failures are mainly due to pulling and rupture of fibres and for 30 degrees and 60 degrees raster angle, failure is due to brittle shear in a direction parallel to raster orientation. Due to the presence of number of heating and cooling cycle in 90 degrees raster orientation, interlayer cracking and distortion of raster take place leading to lower strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available