4.6 Article

Tumor-Stroma Ratio Is an Independent Predictor for Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 1457-1461

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318260dfe8

Keywords

Squamous cell carcinoma; Esophageal neoplasms; Survival; Tumor-stroma ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) has been identified as a new and practicable prognostic histological characteristic of solid tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of TSR in resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: A total of 95 patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC were included in this study. TSR was assessed visually on the hematoxylin-eosin-stained tissue sections of surgical specimens by two independent observers. Patients with more than 50% intratumor stroma were quantified as the stroma-rich group and those with less than 50% as the stroma-poor group. Results: No significant differences were observed in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics between the stroma-rich and stroma-poor groups. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 64% and 57%, respectively, in the stroma-poor group, and 23% and 23%, respectively, in the stroma-rich group. Both 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates in the stroma-poor group were significantly better than those in the stroma-rich group (p < 0.01). In a multivariate analysis, TSR was identified as a highly significant prognostic factor for 3-year overall survival (hazard ratio 3.450; p = 0.001) and 3-year disease-free survival (hazard ratio 2.995; p = 0.001), independent of pTNM stage and radicality of the primary tumor. Conclusion: Stroma-rich tumors were associated with poor prognosis and an increased risk of relapse, which may serve as a new prognostic histological characteristic in ESCC. TSR is simple and quick to determine, is reproducible, and could be easily incorporated in routine histological evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available