4.6 Article

Cerebrospinal Fluid Concentration of Erlotinib and its Active Metabolite OSI-420 in Patients with Central Nervous System Metastases of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages 950-955

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e2138b

Keywords

Erlotinib; Non-small cell lung cancer; Cerebrospinal fluid; Brain metastasis; Carcinomatous meningitis

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22390029] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although there have been several reports in which central nervous system (CNS) metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were improved by erlotinib, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration of erlotinib in such patients has not been reported. We investigated CSF concentrations of erlotinib and its active metabolite OSI-420. Method: We administered 150 mg erlotinib daily to four patients with NSCLC who had CNS metastases, and we investigated plasma pharmacokinetics of erlotinib and OSI-420 on days 1 and 8. In addition, we measured the concentrations of erlotinib and OSI-420 in CSF just before administration of erlotinib on day 8. Results: In all cases except for one case, plasma pharmacokinetics data on day 8 were similar to those previously reported. The mean +/- SD CSF concentrations of erlotinib and OSI-420 were 54 +/- 30 ng/ml and 10.8 +/- 8.2 ng/ml, respectively. The mean +/- SD CSF penetration rates of erlotinib and OSI-420 were 5.1% +/- 1.9% and 5.8% +/- 3.6%, respectively. CSF concentrations of erlotinib exceeded median inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) of erlotinib in intact tumor cells with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor gene. Conclusion: The CSF penetrations of erlotinib and OSI-420 in patients with NSCLC who had CNS metastases were approximately 5.1% and 5.8%, respectively. This indicates that erlotinib can become a treatment option for CNS metastases of NSCLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available