4.3 Article

Computed Tomographic Imaging of the Airways in COPD and Asthma

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 290-300

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182277113

Keywords

Multidetector computed tomography; COPD; asthma; airways; quantitative imaging

Funding

  1. German Research Council (DFG) [EI 804/1-1]
  2. Federal Ministry of Research (BMBF) [01GIO884]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computed tomography (CT) is the modality of choice for imaging the airways. Volumetric data sets with isotropic spatial resolution based on multidetector thin-section CT with overlapping reconstruction should be used. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma are the 2 most common disease entities that are defined by airflow obstruction. The morphologic correlates of airway changes are dilation of the lumen, thickening of the wall, visibility of small airways due to mucus or edema, air trapping, hypoxic vasoconstriction, and collapsibility. To assess air trapping, additional expiratory low-dose scans are recommended. In clinical routine, these findings are visually assessed and should be routinely reported. However, the interobserver variability is high, and there is a clear need for objective software-based measurements. The development of such tools is challenging, and they are just becoming available on a broader scale. Novel techniques based on dual-energy CT aim to measure iodine distribution maps to assess pulmonary perfusion as well as the distribution of inhaled xenon gas to assess the distribution and time course of pulmonary ventilation. However, these techniques are still being investigated in clinical studies. This review will provide an overview of CT for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, its role in phenotyping these diseases, and the measurement of disease severity and functional compromise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available