4.7 Article

Wireless Physical-Layer Security: Lessons Learned From Information Theory

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages 1814-1825

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2015.2459592

Keywords

Cooperative jamming; information-theoretic secrecy; physical-layer security; structured signaling; untrusted relays

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CCF 09-64362, CCF 09-64645, CCF 13-19338, CNS 13-14719, CNS 13-14733]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1314733] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1314719] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physical-layer security utilizes resources of the transmission medium to guarantee secure communication against an adversary with unlimited computational power. Rooted in information theory, physical-layer security advocates for a foundational approach by requiring security of communicated information as well as its reliability at the outset. The past decade has seen an unprecedented effort in physical-layer security research resulting in promising new design insights. The majority of these advances has been in wireless communications security, well-motivated by the fact that most data at large, including those of sensitive nature, flow over wireless links that are more vulnerable to security breaches, e.g., eavesdropping. At the same time, the open broadcast nature of wireless brings possibilities of cooperation by the network entities for improving security, e.g., resistance to eavesdropping. This article aims to provide an overview of research results in information-theoretic security with multiple wireless transmitters, and focuses on distilling insights for designing wireless systems with confidentiality guarantees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available