4.6 Article

Cardiac stem cells in the real world

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages 673-678

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.024

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Cardiac stem cell transplantation as a potential means of regenerating infarcted myocardium is currently receiving a great deal of interest. However, data on these endogenous cardiac precursors are primarily derived from animal studies, and their clinical relevance still remains elusive. Methods: We prospectively screened 32 endomyocardial biopsies harvested from heart transplant recipients (off rejection episodes) and 18 right appendage biopsies collected during coronary artery bypass surgery, and processed the tissue specimens for the immunohistochemical detection of markers of stemness (c-kit, MDR-1, Isl-1), hematopoietic origin (CD45), mast cells (tryptase), endothelial cells (CD105), and cardiac lineage (Nkx2.5). Confocal microscopy was used for colocalization experiments. Three right appendage biopsies were also cultured for 2 to 3 weeks, at the completion of which c-kit-positive cells were sorted by flow cytometry. Results: In endomyocardial biopsies, a median number of 2.7 (1.8-4) c-kit-positive cells/mm(2) were found, and this number was even significantly smaller in right appendage biopsies (1 [0.5-1.8] c-kit-positive cell/mm(2), P = .01). All of these c-kit-positive cells co-stained for CD45 and were more specifically identified as mast cells by their positive staining for the specific tryptase marker. However, none of the c-kit-positive cells expressed the markers of stemness MDR-1 and Isl-1 or colocalized with CD105. Flow cytometry confirmed the small number of c-kit-positive cells in cultured right atrial appendages. Conclusion: These data raise a cautionary note on the therapeutic exploitation of cardiac stem cells in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, who may be the elective candidates for regenerative therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available