4.6 Article

A theoretical kinetics study of the reactions of methylbutanoate with hydrogen and hydroxyl radicals

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages 481-489

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.117

Keywords

Chemical kinetics; Methylbutanoate; Hydrogen radical; Hydroxyl radical; Transition state theory

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council/Early Career Scheme [PolyU 5380/13E]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Council (SZSTI) [JCYJ20130401152508650]
  3. National Key Scientific Instruments and Equipment Development Program of China [2012YQ22011305]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of China [21373193]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical kinetics for the reactions of methylbutanoate (MB) with hydrogen and hydroxyl radicals were studied theoretically with the ab initio transition state theory. In addition to the hydrogen abstraction reactions of MB by the radicals, the potential energy surfaces of MB + H and MB + OH were further investigated to search for additional significant hydrogen addition channels, which are followed by beta-scission reactions to produce non-hydrogen and non-water products, respectively. Stationary points on the potential energy surfaces were calculated at the QCISD(T)/CBS//B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level. Phenomenological rate coefficients for temperature-and pressure-dependent reactions were calculated over broad ranges of temperature (200-2500 K) and pressure (1.3 x 10(-3)-10(2) atm) by solving the timedependent multiple-well master equation. The theoretical rate coefficients were compared with the available experimental and theoretical data and observed discrepancies were analyzed. The predicted rate coefficients are represented in the forms that may readily be used in combustion modeling of MB. (C) 2014 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available