4.6 Article

Quantitative infrared imaging of impinging turbulent buoyant diffusion flames

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages 2647-2655

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.115

Keywords

Turbulent buoyant flames; Impinging flames; Flame radiation; Fire Dynamics Simulator; Infrared imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A buoyant fire impinging on a horizontal ceiling at a certain distance from the fuel source occurs in many practical fire scenarios. Motivated by this application, infrared radiation from buoyant diffusion flames with and without impingement on a flat plate is studied using a quantitative comparison of measured and simulated images. The measured quantitative images of the radiation intensity are acquired using a calibrated high speed camera. Simulated radiation intensities are rendered in the form of images and compared quantitatively with the measured images. The simulated radiation intensities are obtained using the radiative transfer equation with local absorption coefficients evaluated using a narrowband radiation model. The instantaneous local species concentrations, soot volume fractions, and temperatures necessary for these simulations are calculated using the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) version 6. The measured images reveal that the characteristic necking and bulging (7 Hz +/- 1 Hz) of the free buoyant flame is suppressed to a large extent by impingement on the plate. The roll-up vortices in the impinging flame are much smaller than those in the free flame. The stagnation point boundary layer inferred from the computed images is thicker at some instances than that inferred from the measurements. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons between the measured and computed infrared images for both the free and the impinging fires reveal many similarities as well as differences useful for model evaluation. (C) 2014 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available