4.7 Article

Thermogravimetric detection of incompatibilities between atenolol and excipients using multivariate techniques

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages 169-177

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-013-3070-y

Keywords

Atenolol; Excipients; Incompatibilities; TG; DSC; FTIR; Cluster analysis; Principal component analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this research study was evaluation of the utility of two common multivariate techniques, agglomerative cluster analysis (CA) and principal component analysis (PCA), as supplementary means of detecting incompatibilities, which can occur between active pharmaceutical ingredients and excipients at the preformulation stage of a solid dosage form. For the detection of incompatibilities between atenolol (beta blocker) and selected excipients (mannitol, lactose, starch, methylcellulose, beta-cyclodextrin, meglumine, chitosan, polyvinylpyrrolidone and magnesium stearate), the thermogravimetry (TG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were chosen. The results have shown that compatibility between atenolol and an excipient can be identified in a CA dendrogram by two large clusters, from which one groups an excipient and physical mixtures with a high concentration of the excipient. Another cluster encompasses atenolol and mixtures with a high content of the drug. In the PCA plot, all samples are located along the first principal component axis (PC1), beginning from a single component located with the most negative PC1 value, through mixtures with gradually varying concentration of both ingredients, till the second component located close to the most positive PC1 values. The results have shown that CA and PCA fulfil their role as supporting techniques in the interpretation of the data acquired from the TG curves, and the obtained data are compatible with the results of DSC and FTIR analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available