Journal
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 243-248Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-011-1513-x
Keywords
Activation energy (E(a)); Cumene hydroperoxide (CHP); Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC); Process safety management (PSM); Stirring rate
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Oxygen (O(2)) or air is widely applied globally to yield cumene hydroperoxide (CHP) in a cumene oxidation tower. In previous studies, CHP has been identified as a thermally hazardous chemical. This study was used to evaluate thermal hazard of CHP in cumene using differential scanning calorimetry and vent sizing package 2 (VSP2). Self-accelerating decomposition temperature (SADT), self-heating rate, exothermic onset temperature (T (0)), critical temperature (T (c)), time to maximum rate (TMR), activation energy (E (a)), etc., were employed to prevent and protect thermal runaway reaction and explosion in the manufacturing process and/or storage area. The reaction order (n) of CHP was evaluated to be 0.5 in this study. The E (a) was determined to be 122 kJ mol(-1) by VSP2. High volume of CHP with 0 rpm of stirring rate by VSP2 was more dangerous than a low one. Control of stirring rate should be a concern in process safety management program. In view of proactive loss prevention, inherently safer handling procedures and storage situations should be maintained in the chemical industries.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available