4.4 Article

Turing-Hopf patterns on growing domains: The torus and the sphere

Journal

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 481, Issue -, Pages 136-150

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.09.028

Keywords

Pattern formation; Turing-Hopf bifurcation; Isotropically growing domains; Fitzhugh-Nagumo model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper deals with the study of spatial and spatio-temporal patterns in the reaction-diffusion FitzHugh-Nagumo model on growing curved domains. This is carried out on two exemplar cases: a torus and a sphere. We compute bifurcation boundaries for the homogeneous steady state when the homogeneous system is monostable. We exhibit Turing and Turing-Hopf bifurcations, as well as additional patterning outside of these bifurcation regimes due to the multistability of patterned states. We consider static and growing domains, where the growth is slow, isotropic, and exponential in time, allowing for a simple analytical calculation of these bifurcations in terms of model parameters. Numerical simulations allow us to discuss the role played by the growth and the curvature of the domains on the pattern selection on the torus and the sphere. We demonstrate parameter regimes where the linear theory can successfully predict the kind of pattern (homogeneous and heterogeneous oscillations and stationary spatial patterns) but not their detailed nonlinear structure. We also find parameter regimes where the linear theory fails, such as Hopf regimes which give rise to spatial patterning (depending on geometric details), where we suspect that multistability plays a key role in the departure from homogeneity. Finally we also demonstrate effects due to the evolution of nonuniform patterns under growth, suggesting important roles for growth in reaction-diffusion systems beyond modifying instability regimes. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available