4.4 Article

Assessment of autonomic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes using reactive hyperemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 330, Issue -, Pages 9-17

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.03.022

Keywords

Autonomic dysfunction; Pulse rate variability; Poincare method; SD1/SD2 ratio (SSR)

Funding

  1. NSC (Taiwan, ROC) [100-2221-E-008-008-MY2, CNJRF-101CGH-NCU-A4, VGHUST102-G1-2-3]
  2. NSC [NSC 101-2911-1-008-001, 100-2221-E-259-030-MY2, NSC 101-2221-E-259-012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is known that aging and type 2 diabetes mellitus contribute to atherosclerosis and autonomic dysfunction. By using the air pressure sensing system (APSS), peak-peak intervals (PPIs) of wrist arterial waveforms from baseline and reactive hyperemia (RH) were obtained. Through frequency domain analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) and nonlinear Poincare method, the HRV of healthy young individuals (Group 1, n=25), healthy upper middle-aged individuals (Group 2, n=22), and patients with type 2 diabetes (Group 3, n=28) were assessed. By using the standard deviation (SD) of the instantaneous PPI variability (SD1)/the SD of the long PPI variability (SD2) ratio (SSR), PPIs of the same individuals before and after RH induction were compared. Reduced SSR1-10 was noted only in patients with diabetes. Moreover, a significient correlation between SSR1-10 and endothelial function was observed in all subjects (r=0.290, p=0.033) after RH. However, no correlation with low-frequency to high-frequency power ratio (LHR) was noted before and after RH. In conclusion, according to our results, campared to the baseline, there were more significant changes of SSR1-10 after RH in patients with diabetes; and, a significient correlation between SSR1-10 and endothelial function at the moment of RH was noted. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available