4.4 Review

Models of coalition or alliance formation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 274, Issue 1, Pages 187-204

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.031

Keywords

Game theory; Cooperation

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture through NSF Award [EF-0832858]
  4. NIH [GM56693]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0805970] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [0805970] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [0832858] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

More than half a century has now elapsed since coalition or alliance formation theory (CAFT) was first developed. During that time, researchers have amassed a vast amount of detailed and high-quality data on coalitions or alliances among primates and other animals. But models have not kept pace, and more relevant theory is needed. In particular, even though CAFT is primarily an exercise in polyadic game theory, game theorists have devoted relatively little attention to questions that motivate field research, and much remains largely unexplored. The state of the art is both a challenge and an opportunity. In this review we describe a variety of game-theoretic and related modelling approaches that have much untapped potential to address the questions that field biologists ask. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available