4.4 Article

Strategy selection in structured populations

Journal

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 259, Issue 3, Pages 570-581

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.035

Keywords

Evolutionary dynamics; Finite populations; Stochastic effects

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM078986-03, R01 GM078986-04, R01 GM078986, R01GM078986] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evolutionary game theory studies frequency dependent selection. The fitness of a strategy is not constant, but depends on the relative frequencies of strategies in the population. This type of evolutionary dynamics occurs in many settings of ecology, infectious disease dynamics, animal behavior and social interactions of humans. Traditionally evolutionary game dynamics are studied in well-mixed populations, where the interaction between any two individuals is equally likely. There have also been several approaches to study evolutionary games in structured populations. In this paper we present a simple result that holds for a large variety of population structures. We consider the game between two strategies, A and B, described by the payoff matrix [GRAPHICS] . We study a mutation and selection process. For weak selection strategy A is favored over B if and only if sigma a + b > c + sigma d. This means the effect of population structure on strategy selection can be described by a single parameter, sigma. We present the values of sigma for various examples including the well-mixed population, games on graphs, games in phenotype space and games on sets. We give a proof for the existence of such a sigma which holds for all population structures and update rules that have certain (natural) properties. We assume weak selection, but allow any mutation rate. We discuss the relationship between s and the critical benefit to cost ratio for the evolution of cooperation. The single parameter, sigma allows us to quantify the ability of a population structure to promote the evolution of cooperation or to choose efficient equilibria in coordination games. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available