4.4 Article

Flux balance analysis: A geometric perspective

Journal

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 258, Issue 2, Pages 311-315

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.01.027

Keywords

Systems biology; Metabolism; Constraint-based modelling

Funding

  1. BBSRC/EPSRC [BB/C008219/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C008219/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advances ill the field of bioinformatics have led to reconstruction of genome-scale networks for a number of key organisms. The application of physicochemical constraints to these stoichiometric networks allows researchers, through methods Such as flux balance analysis, to highlight key sets of reactions necessary to achieve particular objectives. The key benefits of constraint-based analysis lie ill the minimal knowledge required to infer systemic properties. However, network degeneracy leads to a large number Of MIX distributions that satisfy any objective; moreover, these distributions may be dominated by biologically irrelevant internal cycles. By examining the geometry underlying the problem, we define two methods for finding a unique Solution within the space of all possible flux distributions: Such a solution Contains no internal cycles, and is representative of the space as a whole. The first method draws on typical geometric knowledge, but cannot be applied to large networks because of the high computational complexity of the problem. Thus a second method, all iteration of linear programs which scales easily to the genome scale, is defined. The algorithm is run on four recent genome-scale models, and unique flux solutions are found. The algorithm Set Out here will allow researchers in flux balance analysis to exchange typical solutions to their models in a reproducible format. Moreover, having found a single solution, statistical analyses such as correlations may be performed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available