4.3 Article

First Evidence for Hybrid Breakdown in the Backcross of Olive Flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus, and Summer Flounder, Paralichthys dentatus

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 347-353

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00473.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National 863 High Technology Research Foundation of China [2006AA10A404]
  2. Earmarked Fund for Modern Agri-industry Technology Research System, China [nycytx-50]
  3. Key Project of Zhejiang Province of China [2008C12011, 2009C12078]
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006DKA30470-017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hybrid and parental backcross experiments were performed using olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus, summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus, and their female F-1 hybrids to examine hybrid fitness in the backcross. Fertilization rate, hatching rate, and combined fitness measure (CFM, product of fertilization rate and hatching rate) were detected and the results showed that the CFM of hybrid and backcross generations was reduced significantly compared to pure olive flounder crosses. Genomic inheritance from parents to backcross progeny was also detected by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Almost all AFLP bands observed in parents were presented in backcross progeny (backcross1, 218/227; backcross2, 265/282), although 9 and 17 parental bands were missing in backcross1 and backcross2, respectively. Novel bands (absent in parents) also occurred in progeny at the frequencies of 5.63% (13/231) in backcross1 and 3.28% (9/274) in backcross2. Additionally, 27.40 and 31.18% of AFLP markers deviated from expected Mendelian ratio in backcross1 and backcross2, respectively. The present study suggests that genetic incompatibilities may exist between olive flounder and summer flounder. Furthermore, possible implications of segregation distortion for reduced hybrid fitness in backcross generations are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available