4.7 Article

Chemical cleaning of a cross-flow microfiltration membrane fouled by microalgal biomass

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2013.06.018

Keywords

Microfiltration; Membrane fouling; Chemical cleaning; Microalgal biomass

Funding

  1. USM Research University (RU) Grant [1001/PJKIMIA/814060]
  2. USM Postgraduate Research (PRGS) Grant [1001/JKIMIA/8044014]
  3. USM Membrane Science and Technology Cluster
  4. Universiti Malaysia Pahang (SLAB) for the scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we experimentally investigated the water flux recovery following the chemical cleaning of the CA membrane with different chemical cleaning agents. Besides flux recovery analysis, SEM analysis and zeta potential measurement of the membrane samples before and after chemical cleaning were also conducted. Moreover, effect of temperature on cleaning performances was also investigated. The results show that alkaline cleaning agents more effectively removed the foulant layer on the membrane surface than the acidic cleaning agents. In addition, among the tested alkaline agents, 0.75% NaOCl exhibited the best cleaning performance, obtaining approximately 98% flux recovery and removing almost all the major foulants and causing the membrane surface to become almost as porous and clear as it was before the fouling; the latter results were confirmed by SEM analysis. Meanwhile, cleaning with 0.75% NaOH was less effective, resulting in only 68% flux recovery. The SEM analysis found that the acidic agents (HNO3 and citric acid) failed to remove the foulant layer from the membrane surface, which accounts for their poor flux recovery. This study also confirmed that the cleaning temperature affected the flux recovery after each repeated cycle of fouling and cleaning. In general, higher temperatures resulted in higher flux recovery. A T-c of 60 degrees C significantly improved the cleaning of a fouled membrane and attained 98% recovery after the first two cleaning cycles. This effect, however, was not observed with temperatures higher than 60 degrees C. (C) 2013 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available