4.7 Article

New sulfonated polybenzimidazole (SPBI) copolymer-based proton-exchange membranes for fuel cells

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2008.12.014

Keywords

Sulfonated polybenzimidazole (SPBI); Copolymer; Proton-exchange membrane (PEM); High temperature; Low humidity; Proton conductivity; Fuel cell

Funding

  1. Ohio Department of Development [342-0561]
  2. Ohio State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The synthesis and characterization of sulfonated polybenzimidazole (SPBI) copolymers as proton-exchange membranes (PEMs) for fuel cells are described in this paper. A one-step high temperature polymerization method was used to synthesize the SPBI copolymers from 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DABD), 4,4'-oxybis(benzoic acid) (OBBA), and two sulfonated dicarboxylic acids, i.e., 5-sulfoisophthalic acid (SIPA) and 4,8-disulfonyl-2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid (DSNDA), using polyphosphoric acid (PPA) as the solvent. The pure SPBI copolymer membrane was prepared by the traditional solution-casting technique (technique I), and the SPBI/H3PO4 blend membrane was prepared through a new direct hot-casting and in situ phase inversion technique (technique 2). The membranes prepared from both techniques possessed desirable mechanical, chemical, thermal, and hydrolytic stability. However, the pure SPBI copolymer membranes from technique I exhibited very poor proton conductivities since most of the sulfonated groups in SPBIs were neutralized by the basic imidazole groups and became deprotonated sulfonated groups. On the other hand, the SPBI/H3PO4 blend membrane from technique 2 showed extremely high conductivities (>0.1 S/cm) at high temperatures (>120 degrees C) and low relative humidities (RHs) (even at anhydrous conditions), which has great potential to be used as high temperature and low humidity PEMs for fuel cells. (C) 2009 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available