4.0 Article

Chemical composition of the essential oils of Citrus sinensis cv. Valencia and a quantitative structure-retention relationship study for the prediction of retention indices by multiple linear regression

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SERBIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 76, Issue 12, Pages 1627-1637

Publisher

SERBIAN CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.2298/JSC101218141A

Keywords

Citrus sinensis cv. Valencia; volatile constituents; HS-SPME; SDME; QSRR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical composition of the volatile fraction obtained by head-space solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME), single drop microextraction (SDME) and the essential oil obtained by cold-press from the peels of C. Sinensis cv. Valencia were analyzed employing gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The main components were limonene (61.34, 68.27 and 90.50 A), myrcene (17.55, 12.35 and 2.50 %), sabinene (6.50, 7.62 and 0.5 %) and alpha-pinene (0, 6.65 and 1.4 %) respectively obtained by HS-SPME, SDME and cold-press. Then a quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) study for the prediction of retention indices (RI) of the compounds was developed by application of structural descriptors and the multiple linear regression (MLR) method. Principal components analysis was used to select the training set. A simple model with low standard errors and high correlation coefficients was obtained. The results illustrated that linear techniques such as MLR combined with a successful variable selection procedure are capable of generating an efficient QSRR model for prediction of the retention indices of different compounds. This model, with high statistical significance (R-train(2) = 0.983, R-test(2) = = 0.970, Q(LOO)(2) = 0.962, Q(LGO)(2) = 0.936, REP(%) = 3.00), could be used adequately for the prediction and description of the retention indices of the volatile compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available