4.7 Article

In vitro and in vivo antioxidant and antimutagenic activities of polyphenols extracted from hops (Humulus lupulus L.)

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 94, Issue 8, Pages 1693-1700

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6534

Keywords

Humulus lupulus L; hops; phenolic composition; antioxidant activity; antimutagenic activity; proanthocyanidins

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171748]
  2. Key Technology R&D Program of Shanxi Province [20090321097, 20110321078]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDHops (Humulus lupulus L.) contain 40-140mgg(-1) polyphenols. The objective of this study was to determine the phenolic composition of a high-purity (total phenolic content=887mgg(-1)) hop polyphenol extract (HPE) and evaluate its antioxidant activities in vivo and in vitro and its antimutagenic activity. The antioxidant activity of HPE was compared with the activity of green tea polyphenols. RESULTSThe phenolic compositions of HPE were more than 55% proanthocyanidins and more than 28% flavonoid glycosides. In vitro, HPE effectively scavenged ,-diphenyl--picrylhydrazyl, hydroxyl and superoxide anion radicals, and inhibited DNA oxidative damage. In vivo, oral HPE at a polyphenol dose of 200-800mgkg(-1) body weight significantly prevented a bromobenzene-induced decrease in liver superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activity, and decreased levels of liver thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in bromobenzene-treated mice. An oral dose of 20-80mgkg(-1) body weight HPE significantly reduced the frequency of bone marrow micronuclei induced by cyclophosphamide. The antioxidant activities of hop polyphenols in vitro and in vivo were higher than green tea polyphenols at the same concentration. CONCLUSIONHop polyphenols had the same or higher antioxidant activity than tea polyphenols. Hop polyphenols might be useful as natural antioxidants and antimutagens. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available