4.7 Article

Effects of drought after pollination on grain yield and quality of fresh waxy maize

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages 210-215

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6709

Keywords

fresh waxy maize; drought; yield; protein content; grain quality

Funding

  1. Chinese Natural Science Foundation [31271640, 31000684]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDWaxy maize is consumed as a vegetable when harvested at fresh stage (23-26 days after pollination) in China. Fresh waxy maize is normally grown under rain-fed conditions and suffers drought frequently during plant growth. The effect of drought on grain development of fresh waxy maize is not known. RESULTSTwo years of pot trials showed that drought decreased fresh grain number and weight, which consequently reduced fresh ear and grain yields, especially in Yunuo7. Moisture and starch contents in grains were not affected but protein content was increased under drought treatment in both varieties. Grain soluble sugar content response to drought was not affected in Suyunuo5 but was decreased in Yunuo7. Pasting and gelatinization temperatures, trough viscosity, final viscosity, setback viscosity, gelatinization enthalpy and springiness of grain were little affected by drought. Drought decreased peak viscosity, breakdown viscosity and adhesiveness (absolute value), whereas it increased hardness. The retrogradation percentage was increased in both varieties in both years. CONCLUSIONDrought after pollination decreased the fresh waxy maize yield. Grain quality was reduced through decreased peak viscosity and adhesiveness (absolute value), while its hardness and retrogradation percentage were increased, which might be due to the increased protein content. (c) 2014 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available