4.7 Article

Health risk assessment of cadmium via dietary intake by adults in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 373-380

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6394

Keywords

cadmium; China; dietary intake; health risk assessment

Funding

  1. Consultative Project of the Chinese Academy of Engineering [2012-ZD-3, 2013-ZD-7-5]
  2. Importation and Development of High-Caliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions [CITTCD20130309, IDHT20130506]
  3. Food Quality and Safety Platform of Beijing Municipal Education Commission [PXM2012_014213_000029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDCadmium in the human diet constitutes a potential chronic hazard to health. The objective of this study was to make a health risk assessment of dietary cadmium intake by adults in the 31 provinces (excluding Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau) of China. RESULTSThe cadmium levels in a total of 2629 individual food samples ranged from not detected (below the limit of detection) to 17.32 mg kg(-1), with the highest concentration being found in an offal sample. The food group meat' showed the highest mean level of 0.129 mg kg(-1), while the lowest concentration of 8.0x10(-4) mg kg(-1) was measured in the food group fruit'. The mean cadmium intakes, hazard quotients and annual excess lifetime cancer risks for national, northern and southern adult populations in China were 3.67 mu g kg(-1) body weight (BW) week(-1), 0.52 and 4.56x10(-5) a(-1), 2.63 mu g kg(-1) BW week(-1), 0.38 and 3.27x10(-5) a(-1) and 4.56 mu g kg(-1) BW week(-1), 0.65 and 5.67x10(-5) a(-1) respectively. CONCLUSIONThe results of risk characterization for the national adult population were lower than safety risk levels of hazard quotient (1) and annual excess lifetime cancer risk (5x10(-5) a(-1)). The mean annual excess lifetime cancer risk for the southern adult population was higher than the safety risk level. Therefore the carcinogenic risk for the southern population is of concern. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available