4.7 Review

A review of the preparation and application of flavour and essential oils microcapsules based on complex coacervation technology

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 94, Issue 8, Pages 1482-1494

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6491

Keywords

complex coacervation; flavour and essential oils; protein and polysaccharide; preparation; application

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [21276157, 21076125]
  2. National Key Technology RD Program [2011BAD23B01]
  3. International Cooperation Project of Shanghai 'Mountaineering Plan' [11290707600]
  4. Shanghai Engineering Technology Research Center of Fragrance and Flavor [12DZ2251400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper briefly introduces the preparation and application of flavour and essential oils microcapsules based on complex coacervation technology. The conventional encapsulating agents of oppositely charged proteins and polysaccharides that are used for microencapsulation of flavours and essential oils are reviewed along with the recent advances in complex coacervation methods. Proteins extracted from animal-derived products (gelatin, whey proteins, silk fibroin) and from vegetables (soy proteins, pea proteins), and polysaccharides such as gum Arabic, pectin, chitosan, agar, alginate, carrageenan and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose are described in depth. In recent decades, flavour and essential oils microcapsules have found numerous potential practical applications in food, textiles, agriculturals and pharmaceuticals. In this paper, the different coating materials and their application are discussed in detail. Consequently, the information obtained allows criteria to be established for selecting a method for the preparation of microcapsules according to their advantages, limitations and behaviours as carriers of flavours and essential oils. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available