4.7 Article

Sugars, ascorbic acid, total phenolic content and total antioxidant activity in passion fruit (Passiflora) cultivars

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages 1198-1205

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5876

Keywords

ascorbic acid; HPLC; passion fruit cultivars; sugars; total antioxidant activity; total phenolic content

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
  2. UPM [RUGS-01-01-12-1592RU]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The levels of sugars, ascorbic acid, total phenolic content (TPC) and total antioxidant activity (TAA) were determined in fruit juices from seven passion fruit (Passiflora spp.) cultivars: P. edulis cultivars Purple, Frederick, Yellow, Pink, P. edulis f. flavicarpa, P. maliformis and P. quadrangularis (we also tested this cultivar's mesocarp). Results Purple and Yellow P. edulis had significantly higher total sugar, 142.85 +/- 0.17 g kg1 and 139.69 +/- 0.12 g kg1, respectively, than other cultivars. Glucose and fructose content were higher in juice from vine-ripened fruits of Purple, Frederick and Yellow P. edulis, P. quadrangularis and P. maliformis. Sucrose content was significantly higher in juice of non-vine-ripened fruits of P. edulis (Pink) and P. edulis f. flavicarpa. Ascorbic acid, TPC and TAA were significantly higher in vine-ripened Purple and Yellow P. edulis; ranges were 0.220.33 g kg1, 342.80382.00 mg gallic acid equivalent L1 and 409.13586.70 mu mol Trolox L1, respectively. Based on principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis, the main variables degrees Brix, total sugar, glucose, fructose, ascorbic acid, TPC and TAA formed the characteristics for the group comprising Purple and Yellow P. edulis. Conclusions Glucose, fructose, sucrose, ascorbic acid, TAA and TPC were quantified in passion fruit juices. Variation of the above variables in juices of Passiflora depends on the cultivar and ripeness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available