4.7 Article

Implications of spatial and temporal changes in concentration of pyruvate and glucose in onion (Allium cepa L.) bulbs during controlled atmosphere storage

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages 683-687

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3502

Keywords

pungency; Allium cepa; onion storage; sampling

Funding

  1. UK Government (Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs
  2. Defra)
  3. UK industry representatives

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Pungency and perceived sweetness are important quality assurance parameters for onion producers; however, there is still a paucity of information describing the spatial changes within the bulb of some taste-related compounds during storage. Accordingly, onion bulbs of cultivars (cvs.), SS1 (low pungency, low dry matter) and Renate (pungent, high dry matter) bulbs, were divided into 12 sections and both spatial and temporal variations of pyruvate and glucose were recorded during standard controlled atmosphere storage. RESULTS: Pyruvate within cv. SS1 bulbs reached 8.3 mu mol g(-1) fresh weight (FW) from pre-storage levels of less than 3.4 mu mol g(-1) FW, whilst pyruvate changes in cv. Renate remained in the 'pungent' category, between 12 mu mol g(-1) FW and 15 mu mol g(-1) FW; thus having fewer implications for marketing and quality assurance. Glucose concentrations were significantly higher for both cvs. in the neck region as compared to basal tissue. Higher glucose levels were recorded in the core of the bulb than in outer scales of cv. Renate. The opposite was found for cv. SS1. There was an inverse correlation of -0.69 and -0.87 between glucose and pyruvate for cvs. SS1 and Renate, respectively. CONCLUSION: In order to measure overall bulb flavour, it is recommended that sampling procedures, particularly for routine pungency determination, be carried out on bulb quarters or wedges rather than equatorial sections. (C) 2009 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available