4.3 Article

Broader health coverage is good for the nation's health: evidence from country level panel data

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12048

Keywords

Health coverage; Health financing; Mortality; Panel data econometrics; Reverse causality

Funding

  1. Rockefeller Foundation
  2. UK Medical Research Council [G1002338]
  3. Medical Research Council [G1002338] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G1002338] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Progress towards universal health coverage involves providing people with access to needed health services without entailing financial hardship and is often advocated on the grounds that it improves population health. The paper offers econometric evidence on the effects of health coverage on mortality outcomes at the national level. We use a large panel data set of countries, examined by using instrumental variable specifications that explicitly allow for potential reverse causality and unobserved country-specific characteristics. We employ various proxies for the coverage level in a health system. Our results indicate that expanded health coverage, particularly through higher levels of publicly funded health spending, results in lower child and adult mortality, with the beneficial effect on child mortality being larger in poorer countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available