4.5 Review

Guidelines in cardiac clinical practice: evaluation of their methodological quality using the AGREE II instrument

Rate this paper

The primary rating indicates the level of overall quality for the paper. Secondary ratings independently reflect strengths or weaknesses of the paper.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search